We help RTL teams reduce schedule uncertainty and uncover simulation-resistant corner cases through a systemized delivery model refined across 325+ formal verification projects.
A block is on the critical path and tape-out dates can’t slip.
Complexity is rising faster than your ability to hire deep formal expertise.
You simulate heavily, but you still worry about rare corner cases.
Formal exists, but bandwidth, structure, or convergence is the bottleneck.
As designs get more complex and schedules get tighter, the hardest bugs show up late, often in scenarios that testbenches don’t reach.
Formal verification can close that gap, but it only becomes predictable when it’s executed with the right structure: clear sign-off targets, sound assumptions, strong abstractions, and disciplined convergence.
Outcome: a verified IP block / subsystem with agreed sign-off criteria and the transparency to defend sign-off internally.
Our delivery model is designed to make formal work predictable and visible — without hero-based consulting:
You bring the designs that are hard to verify with simulation alone.
Input: RTL design, specifications, known risks, and verification goals
We align on target behaviors, bug classes, priorities, and acceptance criteria.
You get: scope, milestones, definition of done, and sign-off targets
We create the formal environment needed for convergence.
You get: abstractions, constraints, environment modeling, and a stable setup
We drive convergence, close coverage goals, and investigate failing properties.
You see: progress, bug findings, coverage status, and remaining risks
We document results and provide a clear formal verification sign-off recommendation.
You receive: final report, findings, limitations, and reusable verification artifacts where agreed
A layered team of verification specialists across every depth of expertise.
Sign-off quality for the IP that protects and differentiates your product.
A proven, repeatable flow that drives predictable quality and coverage.
Your time and budget are limited. To avoid bug escapes and reach the best possible quality for tape out, make formal sign-off a priority of your verification strategy.
Not experts or not willing to do it within your team? Having a custom design that comes with special needs? No problem, we will do it for you. We have done it for others across AI, ML, automotive and more, including RISC-V players.
For formal sign-off, we target simulation-resistant bugs using formal verification supported by the LUBIS EDA Formal Verification Toolbox to accelerate the process and improve quality.
It is the combination of multiple verification techniques, including formal verification, that will take you one step closer to quality tape out.
By the way, 66% of ASIC projects are behind schedule. We bet you do not want to be one of them. Count on us to help you stick to your budget and timeline.
It is the combination of multiple verification techniques, including formal verification, that will take you one step closer to quality tape out.
For formal sign-off, we target simulation-resistant bugs using formal verification supported by the LUBIS EDA Formal Verification Toolbox to accelerate the process and improve quality.
By the way, 66% of ASIC projects are behind schedule. We bet you do not want to be one of them. Count on us to help you stick to your budget and timeline.
We identify high-risk blocks, define verification targets, scope efforts, and set up accurate KPIs.
We follow and complete the verification plan defined during setup. We send you weekly feedback and on-the-spot bug reports.
We hand out to you the Assertion IP (AIP) that accelerates run-time and integrates with existing regression tests to validate that a code change does not impact the existing functionality of the final product.
We identify high-risk blocks, define verification targets, scope efforts, and set up accurate KPIs.
We follow and complete the verification plan defined during setup. We send you weekly feedback and on-the-spot bug reports.
We hand out to you the Assertion IP (AIP) that accelerates run-time and integrates with existing regression tests to validate that a code change does not impact the existing functionality of the final product.
Formal verification methods can help you at all design levels. You can count on us at every stage.
Design and specification are still in process during design bring-up.
We provide your design team with an Assertion IP (AIP) based on your specifications.
You then use that AIP to verify that new changes do not affect the existing functionality of your design. You also use it to identify specification mismatches in order to update the AIP according to the changes.
When design and specifications are developed beforehand, we provide an AIP to validate the correct implementation of specified features.
We assess and analyze specific and hard-to-verify features based on the project scope and verification plan.
The demand for IP redesign has become standard.
Continuously adding new functionalities to the IP results in growing design complexity. You need to refactor your IP and improve performance to preserve all existing functionalities (documented or not).
RISCV instruction set is an open-source ISA based on RISC principles and is being widely used in many areas due to the flexibility and modularity it offers. Formal verification became a necessity due to the increased usage of RISCV cores in many critical domains.
Over 50 bugs were found during the first round of verification of this design in several instructions.
The bugs that were found were due to wrong execution of instructions, wrong exception handling and violation of the standard ISA description of the instructions.
A bug was found in the BLT instruction where the design generates an exception when it should not. The instruction should check if register rs1 is less than rs2, if the condition holds true, then jump to the target address. However, the design was calculating the target address before evaluating if the condition is true which resulted in a misaligned address exception to be asserted, resulting in wrong values in some of the CSRs.
A bug was found in the JALR instruction where the design wrongly writes the fetching address of the JALR instruction to the register file in case a misalignment exception. The design fetches the JALR instruction from address 0x84 where it calculates the target address. In case of a misalignment, a misalignment exception should be generated and the JALR should not take effect. The design was correctly generating a misalignment exception, but it was wrongly writing the fetching PC value to the destination register.
Bring one critical IP block and we’ll outline a formal verification sign-off plan for you.
You are currently viewing a placeholder content from Vimeo. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently viewing a placeholder content from YouTube. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou need to load content from reCAPTCHA to submit the form. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently viewing a placeholder content from Facebook. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently viewing a placeholder content from HubSpot. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently viewing a placeholder content from Hubspot Meetings. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently viewing a placeholder content from Instagram. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou need to load content from hCaptcha to submit the form. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou need to load content from reCAPTCHA to submit the form. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently viewing a placeholder content from Turnstile. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently viewing a placeholder content from X. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More Information